![]() ![]() UKRAINE IS THREATENED BY THE ENTIRE RUSSIAN ARMY As for the rest, we rely on our own forces. It is this political influence of the Alliance that we really hope to see. More could probably be done in 2014, when Russia launched its aggression against Ukraine, occupied Crimea and part of Donbas. Probably more should have been done in 2008, to really use the political levers when the war against Georgia began. They remember what such inaction led to in 19. Importantly, and our NATO partners have confirmed this today, they are well aware of the price to pay if nothing is done. NATO Allies have the appropriate leverage and capabilities to this end. As of the rest, we rely on our own forcesĪll we hope for and want is for the Allies to make appropriate moves in the political dimension in order to deprive the Russian Federation of the opportunity to deploy more forces and launch a new offensive against Ukraine. It is NATO's political influence that we really hope to see. Everyone here understands this, not only servicemen. I understand that it is impossible to get military aid or involve their troops in operations on the territory of Ukraine. In this context, it is worth recalling that NATO is not only a military but also a political alliance. Will NATO be able to help us at all if the Russian leadership dares to pursue such a mad scenario? It is clear that Ukraine is not a member of the Alliance so it cannot expect direct military assistance from NATO in the event of a large-scale Russian offensive. NATO CAN KEEP RUSSIA FROM THE USE OF FORCE THROUGH POLITICAL MEANS Therefore, we must be ready for defense, including in the territories of other regions, if necessary. There are two army corps standing in the first echelon against us, and the whole power of the Russian army is in the second echelon. I reminded the Allies that our war has been going on since 2014, and we have been doing our job ever since. Then I was concerned, but ever since, it’s been simply about doing my job. I replied that I was concerned only once, in 2014, when I first got my rifle, bulletproof vest, and went to war. Our NATO partners had one question – whether I share their concerns. They are well informed of the current situation around Ukraine, no worse than me, everyone understands everything perfectly. Since then, it’s been simply about doing my job I was concerned only once – in 2014, when I got my rifle and went to war. It is clear that not all such information is open, but if possible, could you tell us, what you told NATO Chiefs of Staff? Perhaps your colleagues in the NATO Military Committee were interested in the situation around Ukraine and readiness of the Armed Forces to respond. REMEMBER – THE WAR IN UKRAINE HAS BEEN GOING ON SINCE 2014 Lieutenant General Valeriy Zaluzhnyi on the sidelines of a meeting of the NATO Military Committee told Ukrinform about the readiness of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to respond to the Kremlin's insane scenarios. The very fact that the Ukrainian commander-in-chief was invited to take part in the meeting is significant – neither the Alliance nor any of the allies is indifferent to what’s happening now as a result of Russian military build-up around Ukraine and in the temporarily occupied territories. The United States should not engage in torture of prisoners because it is against the values of the American spirit and torture was not proven to be the most effective means of gaining necessary intelligence.On January 13, the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Lieutenant General Valeriy Zaluzhnyi, took part in a meeting of the NATO Military Committee, the Alliance's highest military body uniting the Chiefs of Staff responsible for ensuring NATO’s readiness to address the arising security challenges. In regard to the use of torture, you should note that I was a member of the Task Force on Detainee Treatment. The president’s commander-in-chief power should not be unconstitutionally constrained by Congress, but the use of that power to override federal statutes should be limited to the most exceptional and constitutionally justified circumstances. As president, I will prioritize reviewing and refining surveillance practices, ensuring their compliance with the Constitution and subjecting them to proper oversight, to achieve a balance between security and civil liberties. It is crucial to strike a careful balance, ensuring our efforts to safeguard the nation do not compromise the privacy and rights of law-abiding citizens. That’s why I put forward policies to rein in surveillance programs, increase transparency and enhance accountability as part of my federal law enforcement reform platform. It has become evident that post-9/11 surveillance measures have, at times, infringed on the rights of Americans. Asa Hutchinson Former governor of Arkansas
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |